- From: John Lumley <john@saxonica.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 20:15:07 +0000
- To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Cc: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>, public-ixml@w3.org
My suggestion was that the top-level structure was organised as key-value pairs for simplicity. But nothing said the values had to be simple scalars… full tree structures would be certainly possible, so for example a map of grammar-level pragma reference mappings could be the value of say a ‘pragmas’ entry. John Sent from my iPad > On 5 Mar 2024, at 19:34, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> wrote: > > A proposal to structure the prolog exclusively as a set of name-value > pairs will work if we cannot imagine wanting to add anything to the > prolog that has a more complex structure. But Norm can imagine wanting > to add something with more complex structure. So can I.
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2024 20:15:14 UTC