- From: Elika Etemad via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:41:30 +0000
- To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-images In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv23985 Modified Files: lc-issues-1.txt Log Message: update issues list Index: lc-issues-1.txt =================================================================== RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/lc-issues-1.txt,v retrieving revision 1.11 retrieving revision 1.12 diff -u -d -r1.11 -r1.12 --- lc-issues-1.txt 22 Feb 2012 02:09:07 -0000 1.11 +++ lc-issues-1.txt 29 Feb 2012 09:41:28 -0000 1.12 @@ -9,12 +9,16 @@ Verified: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0635.html ---- Issue 2. -Summary: Don't use prepositions in gradients +Summary: Don't use prepositions in linear-gradient() From: Robert Biggs Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0720.html -Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0783.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0939.html +Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0783.html +Comment: (private mail - accepted resolution for radial-gradient, but + didn't accept it for linear-gradient) +Note: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Aug/0271.html +Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0384.html +Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0387.html Closed: Rejected -Verified: (private mail - accepted resolution for radial-gradient, but didn't accept it for linear-gradient) ---- Issue 3. Summary: Use of 'bounding box' is undefined, should be 'border box' @@ -24,35 +28,40 @@ Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 4. -Summary: Term 'element reference identifier' needs more explanation, examples, pointers to specs +Summary: 'element reference identifier' underdefined From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0253.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0265.html +Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1398.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 5. -Summary: The element() cycle detection algo phrasing implies an incremental algorithm. +Summary: The element() cycle detection algo phrasing implies an incremental + algorithm. From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0251.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0269.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 6. -Summary: The element() cycle detection algo misses cycles caused by host-language elements. +Summary: The element() cycle detection algo misses cycles caused by + host-language elements. From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0254.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0270.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 7. -Summary: The term "paint sources" is insufficiently defined, and should have explicit definitions for HTML and SVG. +Summary: The term "paint sources" is insufficiently defined, and should + have explicit definitions for HTML and SVG. From: David Baron Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0252.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0264.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 8. -Summary: HTML's definition of "paint source" only exists in the WHATWG version of HTML5, so it should be directly linked to. +Summary: HTML's definition of "paint source" only exists in the WHATWG + version of HTML5, so it should be directly linked to. From: Leif Arne Storset Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0267.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0271.html @@ -66,7 +75,8 @@ Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 10. -Summary: Concrete Object Size resolution algorithm has clumsy text, implying that only one dimension is resolved in one of the steps +Summary: Concrete Object Size resolution algorithm has clumsy text, + implying that only one dimension is resolved in one of the steps From: Kenny Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0395.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0518.html @@ -80,14 +90,14 @@ Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 12. -Summary: element() needs to specify behavior when the selector matches multiple elements. +Summary: specify element() behavior when the selector matches multiple elements From: Kenny Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0394.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0519.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 13. -Summary: image() should specify that its computed value has all absolute urls. +Summary: specify that relative image() urls compute to absolute From: Kennu Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0393.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0696.html @@ -99,10 +109,11 @@ Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0388.html Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1049.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1102.html -Closed: Partially Accepted - keep requirement, but add a generalized form of the commenter's idea as well, as suggested by fantasai +Closed: Partially Accepted - keep requirement, but add a generalized form + of the commenter's idea as well, as suggested by fantasai ---- Issue 15. -Summary: Spec should better define how image-orientation interacts with EXIF data +Summary: Better define how image-orientation interacts with EXIF data From: Simon Fraser Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0311.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0877.html @@ -126,7 +137,8 @@ Verified: (Verified as part of in-person discussion during the February CSSWG f2f.) ---- Issue 18. -Summary: Define 'dpi' and 'dpcm' in terms of the real physical units, not the CSS units +Summary: Define 'dpi' and 'dpcm' in terms of the real physical units, + not the CSS units From: Kenny Lu Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0408.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0430.html @@ -141,14 +153,16 @@ Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 20. -Summary: It's unclear if image-resolution is supposed to apply to images specified in CSS +Summary: It's unclear if image-resolution is supposed to apply to images + specified in CSS From: Simon Fraser Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0323.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0329.html Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 21. -Summary: The spec points to Values & Units for a definition of <position>, but it's not defined there. +Summary: The spec points to Values & Units for a definition of <position>, + but it's not defined there. From: Lea Verou Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0950.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1106.html @@ -163,7 +177,8 @@ Closed: Accepted ---- Issue 23. -Summary: Wording of 'object-fit:fill' seems to imply that the content box *must* be filled +Summary: Wording of 'object-fit:fill' seems to imply that the content box + *must* be filled From: Leif Arne Storset Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0034.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0099.html @@ -175,4 +190,16 @@ Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0036.html Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0098.html Closed: Rejected -Verified: \ No newline at end of file +Verified: +---- +Issue 25. +Summary: specify alignment of varying-size pages for broken element() +From: fantasai +Closed: Accepted +---- +Issue 26. +Summary: Allow image() to accept element() +From: TabAtkins +Comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0265.html +Response: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1398.html +Closed: Accepted
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 09:41:37 UTC