- From: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:29:25 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> skreiv Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:14:31 +0100 > On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:31 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> > wrote: >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#element-reference >> (Overview.html revision 1.269) says the following: >> >> # Host languages may define that some elements provide a paint >> # source. Paint sources have an intrinsic width, height, and >> # appearance, separate from the process of rendering, and so may >> # be used as images even when they're not being rendered. Examples >> # of elements that provide paint sources are the <linearGradient>, >> # <radialGradient>, and <pattern> elements in SVG, or the <img>, >> # <video>, and <canvas> elements in HTML. >> >> Given that the SVG and HTML specifications don't currently define >> that these elements provide a paint source, I think *this* >> specification should define that they provide a paint source, and >> define how they do. It can still allow other languages to add >> defintions, and future levels of HTML and SVG to revise theirs. > > HTML defines that <img>, <video>, and <canvas> provide paint sources > (go to the section for each element, and search for "paint source"). Note that only the WHATWG version of HTML5 talks about paint sources. I don't know whether this is a problem. -- Leif Arne Storset Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Oslo, Norway
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 09:30:20 UTC