- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:14:31 -0800
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 10:31 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#element-reference > (Overview.html revision 1.269) says the following: > > # Host languages may define that some elements provide a paint > # source. Paint sources have an intrinsic width, height, and > # appearance, separate from the process of rendering, and so may > # be used as images even when they're not being rendered. Examples > # of elements that provide paint sources are the <linearGradient>, > # <radialGradient>, and <pattern> elements in SVG, or the <img>, > # <video>, and <canvas> elements in HTML. > > Given that the SVG and HTML specifications don't currently define > that these elements provide a paint source, I think *this* > specification should define that they provide a paint source, and > define how they do. It can still allow other languages to add > defintions, and future levels of HTML and SVG to revise theirs. HTML defines that <img>, <video>, and <canvas> provide paint sources (go to the section for each element, and search for "paint source"). SVG uses the term "paint source" already, though I probably should go ahead and define how the coordinate systems map - I plan to match what roc already did. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 6 February 2012 09:15:27 UTC