W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-images] Probably Editorial: computed value of image()

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:10:53 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCW6G9U64KpFd=uK4fxvFwz1v3t2G6n+5DMDSF+Mex_QA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
Cc: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
<kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> 3.2. Image Fallbacks and Annotations: the ‘image()’ notation
> Does this section need to mention that if a property's specified value
> contains a image(), the computed value is the image() with each <string>
> in it resolved to absolute URI? Or is this obvious enough?
> (I think CSS3 Values should mention this for <url> as well even if it is
> somehow redundant with each "as specified, but with URIs made absolute")

I've gone ahead and specified this in Images.  I've poked fantasai
about specifying this in V&U as well. Please let me know if the edit
is okay.

Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 00:11:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:11 UTC