W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-images] editorial comments

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 02:36:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDciEm7Ex9GSAyt7KKVWxuAZ0hGefYSOieVf8wN3uTz7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
Cc: WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>, John Hax <johnhax@gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
<kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> wrote:
> 2. Resolution Units: the <resolution> type
>  # Note that due to the 1:96 fixed ratio of CSS ‘in’ to CSS ‘px’, ‘1dppx’
>  # is equivalent to ‘96dpi’. This corresponds to the default resolution
>  # of images displayed in CSS: see ‘image-resolution’.
> A friend of mime (John Hax in the Cc list) complains about this and he
> seems to think CSS2.1 Issue 149(px vs. pt)[1] should be resolved in
> favor of the pt-unit proposal (making only 'pt' physical).

The WG resolved that issue already, and I agree with it and won't
revisit it for Images.  I recommend reviewing the (lengthy) thread
about the subject from last year, and if you still disagree, raising
the issue with the WG in the context of the Values & Units spec, which
is the current defining spec for the px unit.

> 4. Gradients
>  # The two functions described in this section allow an author to specify
>  # such an image in a terse syntax
> s/two/four ? Not sure if you want to count repeating-* in.
>  # where <linear-gradient>, <radial-gradient>, <repeating-linear-gradient>,
>  # and <repeating-radial-gradient> are defined in their applicable
> sections
>  # below.
> For some reason, only <linear-gradient> gets a xref.
>  # Gradients are a type of image, and can be used anywhere an image
>  # can, such as in the ‘background-image’ or ‘list-style-image’ properties.
> This informative paragraph pretty much duplicates everything the
> following example (13) says and hence I think it can be dropped.
> 4.1.2. Linear Gradient Examples
> Example 19
> In the ED, the SVG <object> gave me scroll bars. This was confusing when
> I first read this via Safari which hides the scroll bars and made me
> think this picture is wrong. No scroll bars please!
> 4.3. Repeating Gradients: the ‘repeating-linear-gradient()’ and
> ‘repeating-radial-gradient()’ notations
> (Nitpicking) <a>find the average color</a> of a gradient → <a>find the
> average color of a gradient</a> for editorial consistency.
> 5.4. Sizing Objects: the ‘object-fit’ property
> In the description of the 'none' value, I think you meant to link
> "object sizing algorithm" to the algorithm but missed it.
> [1] http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-149

I've made all of these changes.

Please let me know if these resolutions are acceptable.

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 10:36:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:10 UTC