[css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec from Lea Verou on 2012-01-21 (www-style@w3.org from January 2012)

From: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:33:23 +0200
To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4F1ABEA3.2090604@gmail.com>

It seems the grammar for <position> is duplicated in the definition of the `transform-origin` property [1], rather than being deferred to the one that can be found in css3-background [2]

On the other hand, css3-images do try to point to its definition elsewhere, but they point to css3-values, which doesn't define it [3]

[1]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-2d-transforms/#transform-origin
[2]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-background-position
[3]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#radial-gradients

-- 
Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)

Received on Saturday, 21 January 2012 13:33:58 UTC