- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:47:05 -0800
- To: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems the grammar for <position> is duplicated in the definition of the `transform-origin` property [1], rather than being deferred to the one that can be found in css3-background [2] > > On the other hand, css3-images do try to point to its definition elsewhere, but they point to css3-values, which doesn't define it [3] > > [1]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-2d-transforms/#transform-origin > [2]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-background-position > [3]: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#radial-gradients Wow, I forgot how much this thread sidetracked. Anyway, V&U *does* define <position>, but it's in the ED, not the latest WD. The references are filled in automatically, unfortunately. So, I won't be making any change to the Images spec based on this. Please indicate if this resolution is acceptable. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 01:47:52 UTC