W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > August 2019

[csswg-drafts] [css-lists-3] Should automatic list-item increment adjust for ol[reversted]? (#4181)

From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 16:48:37 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-478582548-1565282916-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
fantasai has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-lists-3] Should automatic list-item increment adjust for ol[reversted]? ==
The list-item counter is defined to automatically increment by one on each element with `display: list-item`. (See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3686 for how that works.) `<ol reversed>` lists need to have a list-item increment of -1.

Should this be done by magic interactions with the host language, or should the UA style sheet simply include `ol[reversed] > li { counter-increment: list-item -1; }`?

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4181 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2019 16:48:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:51 UTC