Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-lists-3] Should automatic list-item increment adjust for ol[reversed]? (#4181)

The problem is that we're barred from the obvious methods of extending counter-reset, due to the historical lack of commas. `counter-reset: foo reversed;`, for example, just resets two counters, `foo` and `reversed`.

We could do more complex stuff, like stuffing new values into a function or something.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4181#issuecomment-520181412 using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 10 August 2019 21:37:26 UTC