W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > August 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-lists-3] Should automatic list-item increment adjust for ol[reversted]? (#4181)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 16:54:39 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-519601587-1565283278-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
It doesn't work thru the UA stylesheet:

* That requires that it show up in the serialization of the computed value of 'counter-increment', which no browser does, and which Firefox tried to do but backed off from. (Well, I think they just tried to do the normal incrementing, but it seems weird for `ol` to influence counter-increment sometimes but not other times.)
* It means that any non-initial value for counter-increment needs to explicitly reproduce the 'list-item' behavior. I don't think it's reasonable to allow people to ignore 'list-item' for the CSS inherent behavior, but require them to pay attention to it for the HTML inherent behavior.

GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4181#issuecomment-519601587 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2019 16:54:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:51 UTC