xml-dist-app@w3.org from July 2003 by author

Agarwal, Naresh

• Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? (Thursday, 10 July)

Anish Karmarkar

• Re: Optimisations other than Base64 (Wednesday, 30 July)

Christopher B Ferris

• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 (Tuesday, 15 July)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? (Sunday, 13 July)

Eugene Kuznetsov

• RE: Optimisations other than Base64 (Tuesday, 29 July)

Heli Desai

• SOAP Java Code (Saturday, 26 July)

Herve Ruellan

• Re: MTOM issue: does the HTTP update need to be a feature? (Thursday, 10 July)

Jacek Kopecky

• Re: ordering (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: renaming MTOM (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: ordering [was: regarding the resolution of issue 431] (Thursday, 17 July)
• Proposed resolutions for issues 432 and 435 (long) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Optimization Mechanism description (was PASWA Feature Description) (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: [MTOM issue] OptimizationCandidates should be OptimizedElements (Friday, 11 July)
• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: [MTOM issue] OptimizationCandidates should be OptimizedElements (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 (Thursday, 10 July)
• MTOM addition: Providing media types to data in XML (Wednesday, 9 July)
• [MTOM issue] OptimizationCandidates should be OptimizedElements (Wednesday, 9 July)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Comments on 1st July draft of SMTOM (Thursday, 3 July)

John J. Barton

• Re: renaming MTOM (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: ordering [was: regarding the resolution of issue 431] (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: Requirements for attachments^H^H^H transport optimisation (Thursday, 3 July)

jones@research.att.com

• RE: renaming MTOM (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: renaming MTOM (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: Requirements for attachments transport optimisation (Thursday, 3 July)

Marc Hadley

• Re: renaming MTOM (Monday, 21 July)
• Action item: MTOM relationship to the current HTTP binding (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 (Monday, 14 July)
• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 (Thursday, 10 July)

Mark Jones

• ARTF telcon summary (additional item) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• ARTF telcon summary (Wednesday, 30 July)
• proposed preamble text for the requirements doc (Tuesday, 29 July)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Options for flagging MTOM processing (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: Optimisations other than Base64 (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: Optimisations other than Base64 (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Options for flagging MTOM processing (Tuesday, 29 July)
• regex for media types (Tuesday, 29 July)
• MTOM Section 3.2 Preamble (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Optimisations other than Base64 (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: renaming MTOM (Monday, 28 July)
• new requirements for attachments (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: renaming MTOM (Monday, 21 July)
• Requirements document for attachments (Monday, 21 July)
• Thinking about media types in XML (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: MTOM Issue: Merge 'Abstract' and 'HTTP' feature URIs? (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: ordering (Thursday, 17 July)
• renaming MTOM (Thursday, 17 July)
• ordering [was: regarding the resolution of issue 431] (Wednesday, 16 July)
• Re: [MTOM issue] OptimizationCandidates should be OptimizedElements (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 (Thursday, 10 July)
• regarding the resolution of issue 431 (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: [MTOM issue] OptimizationCandidates should be OptimizedElements (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Requirements for attachments^H^H^H transport optimisation (Thursday, 3 July)
• Requirements for attachments^H^H^H transport optimisation (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Re: MTOM issue: does the HTTP update need to be a feature? (Monday, 30 June)
• Re: Optimization Mechanism description (was PASWA Feature Description) (Monday, 30 June)
• Re: Optimization Mechanism description (was PASWA Feature Description) (Monday, 30 June)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Optimisations other than Base64 (Wednesday, 30 July)
• RE: Proposed text for Base64-specific optimization (Wednesday, 30 July)
• RE: renaming MTOM (Thursday, 17 July)
• RE: renaming MTOM (Thursday, 17 July)
• MTOM Issues 431 and 432 (Friday, 4 July)
• Comments on 1st July draft of SMTOM (Wednesday, 2 July)

MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

• charset="utf-8" .vs. charset=utf-8 in MIME headers (Thursday, 31 July)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• New SOAP Editorial Issue (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Proposed text for Base64-specific optimization (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Optimisations other than Base64 (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: renaming MTOM (Monday, 28 July)
• Proposed action item on base URI (Friday, 25 July)

Rich Salz

• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? (Sunday, 13 July)

Robin Berjon

• Re: Optimisations other than Base64 (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: Options for flagging MTOM processing (Wednesday, 30 July)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? (Sunday, 13 July)

Tony Graham

• MTOM Issue: Merge 'Abstract' and 'HTTP' feature URIs? (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: MTOM issue: does the HTTP update need to be a feature? (Thursday, 10 July)

Wiechers, Volker

• Recall: Regrets for 7/30 telecon (Friday, 25 July)
• Regrets for 7/30 telecon (Friday, 25 July)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2003 15:03:26 UTC