W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2003

Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: 10 Jul 2003 09:31:42 +0200
To: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
Cc: "Xml-Dist-App@W3. Org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1057822302.8052.9.camel@localhost>

Mark, it may be the morning for me, but I just don't get it. I'd like to
keep MTOM simple and I don't see the variety of qualities you mention. I
don't think the text below sounds like an actual issue.

Granted, the optimization preservation across intermediaries is just an
'e.g.' in issue 431, but I like concrete issues, therefore I proposed we
close issue 431 by saying what seems to be the consent of the group,
i.e. that intermediaries can indeed change what is optimized.

Are you (and maybe others) saying that you disagree with the line above
tentatively and wish to wait until we have the requirements?

Or are you saying that there may be a bigger issue we will see after we
have the requirements? If this is the case, let's close 431, wait for
the requirements and open issues stemming from them.

Best regards,

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect
                   Systinet Corporation
                   http://www.systinet.com/





On Thu, 2003-07-10 at 01:17, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> To complete my AI;
> 
> I think that some people still have doubt about this issue because we have
> not completely identified the requirements that we're attempting to
> address with MTOM. Specifically, it may be that MTOM enables optimisation
> in with a variety of qualities, and therefore will need to be modeled as
> properties which can then be used by intermediaries as input to
> optimisation decisions.
> 
> As a result, people are not comfortable with closing issue 431.
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2003 03:31:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:14 GMT