public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org from September 2007 by thread

Output of p:xslt and p:xslt2 / xpointer Vasil Rangelov (Saturday, 29 September)

XProc Last Call Comments Norman Walsh (Thursday, 27 September)

p:add-xml-base all=true and relative=true Norman Walsh (Thursday, 27 September)

p:add-xml-base with relative=true Norman Walsh (Thursday, 27 September)

Improve XProc suitability for localization Jirka Kosek (Wednesday, 26 September)

Inconsistency between schema and spec Jirka Kosek (Wednesday, 26 September)

Re: Comment Vasil Rangelov (Monday, 24 September)

Comment: untrusted environments and security Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com (Sunday, 23 September)

Comment: version and forward compatibility Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com (Sunday, 23 September)

p:xslt and p:xslt2 (and "p:any-xslt"?) Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com (Monday, 24 September)

Saxonica comments on XProc Last-Call WD, sections 5-7 Michael Kay (Saturday, 22 September)

Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 3 and 4 Michael Kay (Saturday, 22 September)

Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 Michael Kay (Saturday, 22 September)

An unfulfilled requirement maybe? Vasil Rangelov (Monday, 17 September)

looks like WG has decided against split James Fuller (Monday, 17 September)

re: splitting James Fuller (Monday, 17 September)

About the splitting... Vasil Rangelov (Sunday, 16 September)

Re: XML Pipelines in Enterprise Integration? Ramkumar Menon (Thursday, 13 September)

file operations and XProc James Fuller (Wednesday, 12 September)

p:load? Vasil Rangelov (Friday, 7 September)

processor switches James Fuller (Wednesday, 5 September)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2007 17:58:51 UTC