W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2

From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:15:08 +0200
Message-ID: <21d9ade60709261315g1e745af6l7a202dcd4e6dc3fc@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Michael Kay" <mike@saxonica.com>
Cc: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

On 9/26/07, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the quick reply.
> >
> > | 2. Nomenclature. "validate-xml-schema" is a misleading name
> > for a step
> > | that validates an instance.
> >
> > Uhm. I suppose. I guess we could rename them
> > "validate-with-xml-schema", "validate-with-relax-ng",
> > "validate-with-schematron" if you think that would be a
> > significant improvement.
>
> Unless you've got a standard format for step names like verb-noun, I think I
> would use "xml-schema-validate", "relax-ng-validate".

It was the case at first, but XML spec forbids us to use names
starting with (X|x) (M|m)(L|l)

Xmlizer
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:15:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:24 UTC