W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org > September 2007

Re: p:load?

From: Vasil Rangelov <boen.robot@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 22:17:50 +0300
To: <public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <46e446f8.26a75e0a.3182.ffffe65b@mx.google.com>

>To my mind, the point of p:load is that the URI that you load from can 
>be dynamic (eg passed in as an option or contained in an input 
>document). I don't see any way to do that *without* p:load, unless I've 
>missed something?

If that's the case, shouldn't XProc somehow allow dynamic URIs be passed
with <p:document/>? Perhaps by making "href" an actual option (i.e.
adjustable with either p:option or with the shortcut syntax) with access to
other options (and/or parameters?) by variable reference? I mean, what would
that break?

And in any case (with or without p:load), what do you think about the
validate-on-parse and resolve-externals options? And the p:validate-dtd

Vasil Rangelov
Received on Sunday, 9 September 2007 19:18:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:28:24 UTC