public-ws-addressing@w3.org from March 2007 by subject

[ws-rx] I just posted a PR comment on MakeConnection Policy assertion

[ws-rx] RE: Absence of wsam:NonAnon implies prohibition of non-anon response (was RE: [ws-rx] I just posted a PR comment on MakeConnection Policy assertion)

Absence of wsam:NonAnon implies prohibition of non-anon response (was RE: [ws-rx] I just posted a PR comment on MakeConnection Policy assertion)

agenda item: WS-Naming specification

Agenda WS-Addressing teleconference 2007-03-19

Agenda, WS-Addressing 2006-03-05

alternative c for ws addr lc comment

Composition usecase

Consolodated list of Alternatives A thru D to resolved WS ADDR LC comment

Corrected Proposed Alternative A for resolution of ws addr metadata LC comment

Draft Minutes 2007-03-19 WS-Addressing Teleconference are attached

Issue with Fault Action Property in WSDL 2.0

Migration path for non-anon

New Alternative F to resolve LC comment on WS addr metadata

New Alternative G to resolve LC comment on WS addr metadata

NEW ISSUE on WS addressing Metadata LC Draft's ws-policy version

New Proposed Alternative D to resolve WS addr metadata LC comment

New Proposed Alterntative C to resolve WS-addr metadata LC comment

Note that the next meeting will be on 2007-04-02

Proposed Alternative E to resolve WS addr metadata LC comment

Proposed schema changes for wsaddr metadata schema corresponding to Alternative E

Separate constraints for replies and faults

Split reponse use case

Why do we need Section 3.16

WS-Addressing Draft Minutes (the real one this time) are attached

WS-Addressing draft minutes 2007-02-26 are attached

WS-Addressing Draft Minutes 2007-03-05 are attached

Last message date: Tuesday, 27 March 2007 23:18:58 UTC