Migration path for non-anon

Right now if I assert "non-anonymous is OK here", I'm making a fairly
vague statement.  I'm not saying whether a non-anonymous address has to
have an http:// destination, or whether it could be some WS-RX thingie,
or anything of the sort.  I'm just saying that there are non-anon
addresses that are OK here, and presumably it will be clear out-of-band
exactly which ones (or at least I can just try and maybe get a fault back).

If we (or RX, or whoever) later develop vocabulary for such things, what
has to change in order for policies to be tightened?

Received on Monday, 5 March 2007 20:17:14 UTC