public-cdf@w3.org from August 2005 by author

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: [CDF Framework 1.0] 2.4.1 Rightsizing Cases (Wednesday, 17 August)

Bob Easton

• Comments on Working Draft 09 August 2005 (Tuesday, 23 August)

Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

• Comments on WICD WD 2005-08-09 (Wednesday, 24 August)

duerst

• De auguem que te ama muito . . . saudade duerst (Tuesday, 16 August)

Jeff Schiller

• [CDF Framework 1.0] 2.2 Background Images as Child Objects (Thursday, 25 August)
• [CDF Framework 1.0] 2.3.1 when "amination" equals "stop" (Thursday, 25 August)
• [CDF Framework 1.0] 1.2.4.2 DOM Navigation Question (Thursday, 25 August)
• [WICD-oT-9] WICD review - typos (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: [WICD-oT-2] WICD review - specification naming (Thursday, 25 August)
• [CDF Framework 1.0] 2.4.1 Rightsizing Cases (Tuesday, 16 August)
• [CDF Framework 1.0] 1.2.5.1 What happens to the <object> data attribute? (Tuesday, 16 August)
• [CDF Framework 1.0] 2.2.2 SVG Animated backgrounds (Tuesday, 16 August)
• [CDF Framework 1.0] Appendix D MIME Type thoughts (Monday, 15 August)
• [CDF Framework 1.0] 2.5.2.2 Focus Ring (Monday, 15 August)
• [CDF Framework 1.0] 1.2.4.3 ReferencedDocument interface typo (Monday, 15 August)
• [CDF Use Cases] 3.2.14 <object> not the only way to reference other formats (Monday, 15 August)

Jon Ferraiolo

• Re: [CDF Framework 1.0] 2.4.1 Rightsizing Cases (Tuesday, 16 August)
• Re: [CDF Framework 1.0] 1.2.5.1 What happens to the <object> data attribute? (Tuesday, 16 August)

Kevin E Kelly

• The first draft of the Compound Document Framework and by Reference profile has been published (Thursday, 11 August)

Nicolas Mendoza

• Re: [CDF Framework 1.0] 2.4.1 Rightsizing Cases (Monday, 22 August)
• Re: [CDF Framework 1.0] 2.4.1 Rightsizing Cases (Tuesday, 16 August)

olivier Thereaux

• review of "Compound Document Framework 1.0 and WICD Profiles" - summary (Wednesday, 24 August)
• Re: [WICD-oT-6] WICD review - give (even) more definitions, or references to definitions (Wednesday, 24 August)
• [WICD-oT-10] WICD review - definition of "root document" (Wednesday, 24 August)
• [WICD-oT-9] WICD review - typos (Wednesday, 24 August)
• [WICD-oT-8] WICD review - define "compound document" earlier (Wednesday, 24 August)
• [WICD-oT-7] WICD review - split the specification (Wednesday, 24 August)
• [WICD-oT-6] WICD review - give (even) more definitions, or references to definitions (Wednesday, 24 August)
• [WICD-oT-5] WICD review - normative versus informative (Wednesday, 24 August)
• [WICD-oT-4] WICD review - conformance section (Wednesday, 24 August)
• [WICD-oT-3] WICD review - scope of the framework (Wednesday, 24 August)
• [WICD-oT-2] WICD review - specification naming (Wednesday, 24 August)
• [WICD-oT-1] WICD review - general comments (Wednesday, 24 August)
• Starting review of "Compound Document Framework 1.0 and WICD Profiles" (Wednesday, 24 August)

Robin Berjon

• Re: [WICD-oT-2] WICD review - specification naming (Thursday, 25 August)
• Re: [WICD-oT-2] WICD review - specification naming (Wednesday, 24 August)

Last message date: Thursday, 25 August 2005 16:08:36 UTC