W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cdf@w3.org > August 2005

Re: [WICD-oT-2] WICD review - specification naming

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:06:35 +0200
Message-ID: <430DEC8B.4070100@expway.fr>
To: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
Cc: public-cdf@w3.org

Hi Jeff,

Jeff Schiller wrote:
> I agree this this specific instance is not a big deal, but I
> wholeheartedly agree with Olivier's overall comments that the
> documents give the feel that the WG hasn't sorted through "what to
> call this thing" yet in clear enough terms.  CDF, WICD should be
> reconciled asap as hinted at in Appendix D of "Compound Document
> Framework 1.0 and WICD Profiles".

Yes, sorry if I was unclear. I meant merely to address this small item, 
but I agree that the WG should be consistently wicked ;)

-- 
Robin Berjon
   Senior Research Scientist
   Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 16:06:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:40 GMT