W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-cdf@w3.org > August 2005

Re: [WICD-oT-2] WICD review - specification naming

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:09:56 +0200
Message-ID: <430C3964.6010600@expway.fr>
To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
Cc: public-cdf@w3.org

Olivier,

thank you for your valuable reviews.

olivier Thereaux wrote:
> - content and documents following these profiles are called "WICD  
> content" and "WICD document" in some sections of the spec. The  latter, 
> with the acronym expanded, sounds strange.

Actually this is not rare at all in English, and examples abound. Off 
the top of my head: ATM machine, PIN number, HTML language, DSL line... 
I wouldn't worry about it, I don't think that this specific instance is 
problematic.

-- 
Robin Berjon
   Senior Research Scientist
   Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 09:10:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:40 GMT