Dear CDF working group, This message concludes, for now, my review of the first public working draft of "Compound Document Framework 1.0 and WICD Profiles", Dated 09 August 2005 http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICD-20050809/ Overall, as I stated in my introduction to the review, I think this is a very good and already well written document. I consider my comments as suggestions for the continuation and development of this good work, rather than raising issues. My comments so far were: * Introduction http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0015.html * [WICD-oT-1] WICD review - general comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0016.html * [WICD-oT-2] WICD review - specification naming http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0017.html * [WICD-oT-3] WICD review - scope of the framework http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0018.html * [WICD-oT-4] WICD review - conformance section http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0019.html * [WICD-oT-5] WICD review - normative versus informative http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0020.html * [WICD-oT-6] WICD review - give (even) more definitions, or references to definitions http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0021.html and clarification: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/ 2005Aug/0026.html * [WICD-oT-7] WICD review - split the specification http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0022.html * [WICD-oT-8] WICD review - define "compound document" earlier http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0023.html * [WICD-oT-9] WICD review - typos http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0024.html * [WICD-oT-10] WICD review - definition of "root document" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cdf/2005Aug/0025.html I hope these comments will be useful to the CDF working group in developing a good, interoperable technology. Kind regards, -- olivierReceived on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 03:21:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:10:40 GMT