Summary: Encodings other than base64
Review - Web Services Security: X.509 Token Profile (3 of 3)
Formulating UC-4 as a requirement.
Re: "RPC" and "Messaging" style of SOAP
Sharing MTOM parts for identical leaf nodes
- Re: Sharing MTOM parts for identical leaf nodes
- Re: Sharing MTOM parts for identical leaf nodes
- Re: Sharing MTOM parts for identical leaf nodes
Review - Web Services Security: UsernameToken Profile (2 of 3)
Review - Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security (1 of 3)
- Re: Review - Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security (1 of 3)
- Re: Review - Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security (1 of 3)
normalization questions
Attachments Use Cases Summary
Updated soap message normalization draft available
Intermediary optimization checked in to MTOM (closing issue 431)
XMLP-UC-6 reformulation - simple streaming use case
- Re: XMLP-UC-6 reformulation - simple streaming use case
- Re: XMLP-UC-6 reformulation - simple streaming use case
- Re: XMLP-UC-6 reformulation - simple streaming use case
- Re: XMLP-UC-6 reformulation - simple streaming use case
- RE: XMLP-UC-6 reformulation - simple streaming use case
Media types handling in WSDL 1.2
XMLP-UC-2 reformulation - Representation use case
XInclude and MTOM
Data model task force recommends adoption of data model formulation
- RE: Data model task force recommends adoption of data model formulation
- RE: Data model task force recommends adoption of data model formulation
- Re: Data model task force recommends adoption of data model formulation
experiences with SOAP media type registration
Options for flagging MTOM processing (consolidated feedback)
Re: regex for media types
RE: First Draft of an MTOM Formulation based on the Query Data Model
received your email
Analysis of properties for MTOM
use cases for MTOM
Re: First Draft of an MTOM Formulation based on the Query Data Model
Re: Is whitespace allowed with xsi:nil="true" ?
MTOM Properties
Re: Initial formulation of intermediary semantics for MTOM
- Re: Initial formulation of intermediary semantics for MTOM
- Re: Initial formulation of intermediary semantics for MTOM