xml-dist-app@w3.org from July 2003 by date

Thursday, 31 July 2003

• charset="utf-8" .vs. charset=utf-8 in MIME headers MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

Wednesday, 30 July 2003

• New SOAP Editorial Issue noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Optimisations other than Base64 Anish Karmarkar
• Re: Options for flagging MTOM processing Mark Nottingham
• Re: Optimisations other than Base64 Mark Nottingham
• ARTF telcon summary (additional item) Mark Jones
• ARTF telcon summary Mark Jones
• Re: Optimisations other than Base64 Robin Berjon
• RE: Optimisations other than Base64 Martin Gudgin
• Re: Options for flagging MTOM processing Robin Berjon
• RE: Proposed text for Base64-specific optimization Martin Gudgin

Tuesday, 29 July 2003

• Re: Optimisations other than Base64 Mark Nottingham
• Proposed text for Base64-specific optimization noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Optimisations other than Base64 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Options for flagging MTOM processing Mark Nottingham
• regex for media types Mark Nottingham
• RE: Optimisations other than Base64 Eugene Kuznetsov
• MTOM Section 3.2 Preamble Mark Nottingham
• Optimisations other than Base64 Mark Nottingham
• proposed preamble text for the requirements doc Mark Jones

Monday, 28 July 2003

• Re: renaming MTOM Mark Nottingham
• Re: renaming MTOM noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Saturday, 26 July 2003

• SOAP Java Code Heli Desai

Friday, 25 July 2003

• Proposed action item on base URI noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Recall: Regrets for 7/30 telecon Wiechers, Volker
• Regrets for 7/30 telecon Wiechers, Volker

Monday, 21 July 2003

• Re: renaming MTOM Marc Hadley
• new requirements for attachments Mark Nottingham
• Re: renaming MTOM Mark Nottingham
• Requirements document for attachments Mark Nottingham

Saturday, 19 July 2003

• Thinking about media types in XML Mark Nottingham

Friday, 18 July 2003

• Re: MTOM Issue: Merge 'Abstract' and 'HTTP' feature URIs? Mark Nottingham
• Re: ordering Jacek Kopecky
• Re: renaming MTOM Jacek Kopecky
• MTOM Issue: Merge 'Abstract' and 'HTTP' feature URIs? Tony Graham
• RE: renaming MTOM jones@research.att.com

Thursday, 17 July 2003

• Re: ordering Mark Nottingham
• RE: renaming MTOM Martin Gudgin
• RE: renaming MTOM Martin Gudgin
• Re: renaming MTOM jones@research.att.com
• Re: ordering [was: regarding the resolution of issue 431] Jacek Kopecky
• Re: renaming MTOM John J. Barton
• renaming MTOM Mark Nottingham

Wednesday, 16 July 2003

• Proposed resolutions for issues 432 and 435 (long) Jacek Kopecky
• Re: ordering [was: regarding the resolution of issue 431] John J. Barton
• ordering [was: regarding the resolution of issue 431] Mark Nottingham
• Re: Optimization Mechanism description (was PASWA Feature Description) Jacek Kopecky

Tuesday, 15 July 2003

• Action item: MTOM relationship to the current HTTP binding Marc Hadley
• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 Christopher B Ferris

Monday, 14 July 2003

• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 Marc Hadley
• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? Dan Brickley
• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? Jacek Kopecky

Sunday, 13 July 2003

• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? Dan Brickley
• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? Rich Salz

Friday, 11 July 2003

• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 Jacek Kopecky
• Re: [MTOM issue] OptimizationCandidates should be OptimizedElements Jacek Kopecky

Thursday, 10 July 2003

• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 Marc Hadley
• Re: [MTOM issue] OptimizationCandidates should be OptimizedElements Mark Nottingham
• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 Mark Nottingham
• Re: Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? Jacek Kopecky
• Re: MTOM issue: does the HTTP update need to be a feature? Herve Ruellan
• Are RPC/Encoded Web Services vanishing? Agarwal, Naresh
• Re: MTOM issue: does the HTTP update need to be a feature? Tony Graham
• Re: [MTOM issue] OptimizationCandidates should be OptimizedElements Jacek Kopecky
• Re: regarding the resolution of issue 431 Jacek Kopecky

Wednesday, 9 July 2003

• MTOM addition: Providing media types to data in XML Jacek Kopecky
• regarding the resolution of issue 431 Mark Nottingham
• Re: [MTOM issue] OptimizationCandidates should be OptimizedElements Mark Nottingham
• [MTOM issue] OptimizationCandidates should be OptimizedElements Jacek Kopecky

Friday, 4 July 2003

• MTOM Issues 431 and 432 Martin Gudgin

Thursday, 3 July 2003

• Re: Requirements for attachments^H^H^H transport optimisation Mark Nottingham
• Re: Requirements for attachments^H^H^H transport optimisation John J. Barton
• Re: Requirements for attachments transport optimisation jones@research.att.com
• Comments on 1st July draft of SMTOM Jean-Jacques Moreau

Wednesday, 2 July 2003

• Requirements for attachments^H^H^H transport optimisation Mark Nottingham
• Comments on 1st July draft of SMTOM Martin Gudgin

Monday, 30 June 2003

• Re: MTOM issue: does the HTTP update need to be a feature? Mark Nottingham
• Re: Optimization Mechanism description (was PASWA Feature Description) Mark Nottingham
• Re: Optimization Mechanism description (was PASWA Feature Description) Mark Nottingham

Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2003 15:03:26 UTC