- From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:50:30 -0400
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>, "Xml-Dist-App@W3. Org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
On Friday, Jul 11, 2003, at 07:41 US/Eastern, Jacek Kopecky wrote: > > I also motion to close the (narrower) issue 431 because there seems to > be consensus in the WG that intermediaries can, in general, change what > is optimized. If we come up with a requirement that is contrary to this > (which seems extremely unlikely, considering the voices in the group) > the requirement will be a new information and we'll happily reopen the > issue. > As an example, somebody (I don't remember who) mentioned, during the last telcon, a requirement that attachment order be preserved. I think its premature to start closing potentially related issues until such requirements are clear. Of course we can always close then re-open issues, but what's the point in doing that ? Marc. -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Monday, 14 July 2003 13:50:35 UTC