www-ws-desc@w3.org from May 2007 by date

Thursday, 31 May 2007

• WSDL 2.0 is PR! Amelia A Lewis
• Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! Jean-Jacques Moreau

Wednesday, 30 May 2007

• RE: WSDL 2.0 is PR! Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! Roberto Chinnici

Tuesday, 29 May 2007

• [Bug 4590] References bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 28 May 2007

• Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! Sanjiva Weerawarana

Thursday, 24 May 2007

• Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! Charlton Barreto
• RE: WSDL 2.0 is PR! Charlton Barreto
• Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! Arthur Ryman
• Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! Ramkumar Menon

Wednesday, 23 May 2007

• Re: WSDL 2.0 is PR! Jacek Kopecky
• WSDL 2.0 is PR! Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 22 May 2007

• Re: Two Questions on Extension Components in WSDL 2.0 Arthur Ryman

Monday, 21 May 2007

• Two Questions on Extension Components in WSDL 2.0 Ramkumar Menon
• Re: [Bug 4380] Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042 Amelia A Lewis
• Re: [Bug 4380] Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042 Ramkumar Menon

Sunday, 20 May 2007

• issue 289 considerations Jacek Kopecky
• WSDL RDF mapping implementation Jacek Kopecky

Saturday, 19 May 2007

• Re: unclarity in adjuncts 5.9.6 - soap header block component fragid Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1 Amy Lewis

Friday, 18 May 2007

• Re: Location of wsdl20.xsd in Part 1 Arthur Ryman
• Re: Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1 Ramkumar Menon
• Re: Part 1 -> Table 2.1 - xs:base64, xs:Binary Arthur Ryman
• Re: Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1 Amelia A Lewis
• RE: Editorial correction for RPC Signature Rogers, Tony

Thursday, 17 May 2007

• Part 1 -> Table 2.1 - xs:base64, xs:Binary Ramkumar Menon
• Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1 Ramkumar Menon
• Location of wsdl20.xsd in Part 1 Ramkumar Menon
• [Bug 4457] Comment on Web Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 0: Primer bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 4562] Editorial correction for RPC Signature bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: {rpc signature} ambiguity causes 2 interchange failures for Woden Jonathan Marsh
• [Bug 4563] {rpc signature} ambiguity bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: Editorial correction for RPC Signature Jonathan Marsh
• [Bug 4562] Editorial correction for RPC Signature bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 14 May 2007

• {rpc signature} ambiguity causes 2 interchange failures for Woden John Kaputin (gmail)
• Editorial correction for RPC Signature John Kaputin (gmail)

Thursday, 10 May 2007

• [Bug 4550] Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Minutes, 10 May 2007 WS Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
• [Bug 4550] Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Regrets for 5/10 telcon Charlton Barreto
• FlickrClient Updated keith chapman
• Agenda: 10 May 2007 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• [Bug 4550] Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 9 May 2007

• RE: Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? Arthur Ryman

Tuesday, 8 May 2007

• RE: Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? John Kaputin (gmail)

Friday, 4 May 2007

• Is an assertion required for {http location} EBNF grammar? John Kaputin (gmail)
• Re: extensions in WSDL CM, in Woden John Kaputin (gmail)

Thursday, 3 May 2007

• RE: test suite bug Jonathan Marsh
• extensions in WSDL CM, in Woden Jacek Kopecky
• Re: a few Woden problems John Kaputin (gmail)
• test suite bug Jacek Kopecky

Wednesday, 2 May 2007

• Re: a few Woden problems Jacek Kopecky
• Re: a few Woden problems Jacek Kopecky
• Re: a few Woden problems Jacek Kopecky
• Re: unclarity in adjuncts 5.9.6 - soap header block component fragid Arthur Ryman
• Re: a few Woden problems Lawrence Mandel
• Re: a few Woden problems Arthur Ryman
• Re: a few Woden problems Arthur Ryman
• a few Woden problems Jacek Kopecky
• unclarity in adjuncts 5.9.6 - soap header block component fragid Jacek Kopecky

Last message date: Thursday, 31 May 2007 16:43:36 UTC