- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 18:17:48 +0200
- To: WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Hi all, we still have an open issue 289 in the original issues list [1] about providing RDF representations of our various namespaces, with excerpts from the ontology defined in the RDF mapping. BTW, this may wait until after PR, I expect. The URIs used in the RDF mapping are now summarized there in App B [2]. The ontology (wsdl20.rdf) should live at http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-rdf We may consider putting RDF or RDDL at the following other URIs, too: MessageExchangePatterns and their labels: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-only http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-opt-out http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/in-out http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-in http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-only http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/out-opt-in http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-in-only http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/robust-out-only SafeInteraction class: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl-extensions OperationStyles: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/iri http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/multipart http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/style/rpc Signature extension: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/rpc The bindings: http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/http http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap Is there an in-house style for adding RDF to pre-existing namespaces? Best regards, Jacek [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/issues/wsd-issues.html#x289 [2] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-rdf.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#uri-summary
Received on Sunday, 20 May 2007 16:18:27 UTC