Re: Discrepancy in Section 3.1 - Part 1 from Amelia A Lewis on 2007-05-18 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from May 2007)

From: Amelia A Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 10:30:55 -0400
To: "Ramkumar Menon" <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Message-ID: <ab1ddc7c8bbf0df92726d2f337931a31@xerom.na.tibco.com>

Please *don't*.

Regardless of how generic the name claims it to be, it's still a W3C 
specification, and there's nothing wrong with calling it the *W3C* XML 
Schema Disaster.  I mean, Description.  Language.  Thing.  Whatever.

Amy!
On 2007-05-17 17:38:04 -0400 "Ramkumar Menon" 
<ramkumar.menon@gmail.com> wrote:

> Gurus,
> 
> The title of section 3.1 in Part 1 says "Using W3C XML Schema 
> Description
> Language".
> 
> The acronym "XSD" expands to XML Schema Definition Language.
> 
> I propose the change to the section title as "Using XML Schema 
> Definition
> Language".
> 
> regards,
> Ram
> 
> 

-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com

Received on Friday, 18 May 2007 14:31:28 UTC