- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:49:06 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
0. Dial in information (members only) [.1]:
See the public WG page [.2] for pointers to current documents and other
information, and the private page [.3] for administrative matters.
If you have additions to the agenda, please email them to the WG list
before the start of the telcon.
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0027.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/
[.3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/admin
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Agenda
1. Assign scribe. Lucky minute taker for this week is one of:
Jeff Mischkinsky, David Orchard, Dale Moberg, Umit Yalcinalp,
Charlton Baretto, Asir Vedamuthu, Roberto Chinnici, Youenn Fablet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Approval of minutes:
- Oct 20 telcon [.1].
[.1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/att-0039/2005102
0-ws-desc-minutes.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Review of Action items [.1].
? 2005-07-21: pauld to write a proposal for a working group
report for requirements for schema evolution
following closure of LC124
? 2005-09-26: DaveO to draft a response and send to the WG.
(LC335), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Arthur to draft above as a proposal to be able to
close this issue (LC344#5), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Arthur to look for simplification options for
comment 12 of 344. (LC344#12), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Jonathan to point this out when it gets
Implemented (LC344#13), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Sanjiva and Roberto to investigate defaulting with
interfaceless bindings (LC333), due 2005-10,06
DONE [.3] 2005-10-06: Marsh to investigate LC301 re .NET scenarios,
due 2005-10-13.
DONE [.4] 2005-10-06: Charlton to augment Hugo's proposal with
parameters for all serializations, and syntax
for suppressing parameters, due 2005-10-13.
? 2005-10-20: Bijan to contact WG to ask for contribution to
test suite, due 2005-10-27.
DONE [.5] 2005-10-20: Marsh to forward nits to SPARQL, due 2005-10-27.
? 2005-10-20: Tony to write up issues on I18N draft and email to
WSD mailing-list, due 2005-10-27.
? 2005-10-20: Hugo to send email describing sanjiva's 2
properties
proposal (LC304), due 2005-10-27.
DONE [.6] 2005-10-20: Marsh to go send email asking for clarification
(LC357), due 2005-10-27.
Current Editorial Action Items
? 2005-07-21: Arthur to add stable identifiers for each
assertion, due 2005-09-26.
? 2005-09-26: editors to fix the first paragraph of section 4
... does not make sense at all right now.
(LC344#5), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Editors to add a sentence saying {address} is
optional because it could be defined by other
means, such as an WS-A endpoint reference or maybe
the scenario does not require an address.
(LC344#13), due 2005-10-06.
? 2005-09-26: Editors fix "Case Elements NOT cited" in 6.8.1.2
header to be "Case of elements NOT cited" (LC345),
due 2005-10-06.
Note: Editorial AIs associated with LC issues recorded at [.2].
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/actions_owner.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0044.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0045.html
[.5]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Oct/005
1.html
[.6]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Oct/0042
.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Administrivia
a. Upcoming FTF Nov 9 (joint) 10-11 Tokyo
- Registration [.1] (now closed - any stragglers?)
- Logistics [.2] (hotel registration closes Oct 9th.)
- Wed event [.3]
b. RDF Mapping publication status [.4]
c. I18N review
d. daylight time starts next week
e. LC315 text? [.5]
[.1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Jul/0018.html
[.2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/nov-f2f.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Oct/0002.html
[.4]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/att-0046/wsdl-rd
f.html__charset_ISO-8859-2
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0027.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
5. Issue LC301: {soap action} granularity [.1]
- Response [.2] to Jonathan's mail to the WS-A WG [.3].
- Tom disagrees [.4]
- .NET report from Jonathan [.5].
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC301
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0064.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0003.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0066.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0044.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6. Issue LC304: Definition of a IANA media type token [.1]
- Proposal from Hugo [.2]
- Analysis re LC337 from Hugo [.3]
- Latest proposal from Hugo [.4]
- even later [.5]
- Sanjiva's media type style proposal [.6]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC304
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0024.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0008.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0028.html
[.5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0046.html
[.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0022.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
7. Issue LC345: POST & application/x-www-form-urlencoded
serialization [.1]
- Proposal from Hugo [.2]
- Proposal from Charlton [.3].
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC345
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0063.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0045.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
8. Splitting out the HTTP Binding
- At the FTF there was a groundswell of support for splitting the HTTP
binding out and running it through a third Last Call. I said we'd
consider it at a telcon.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9. Issue LC333: WSDL 2: binding defaults not component model
properties? [.1]
- ACTION: Sanjiva and Roberto to investigate defaulting with
interfaceless bindings.
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC333
-----------------------------------------------------------------
10. Issue LC344: LC ISSUE: Editorial points [.1]
- Proposal (#5):
- remove "it is an error"
- copy the stuff from section 6: if things compose you might
get yourself in trouble
- styles are optional extensions
- ACTION: Arthur to draft above as a proposal to be able to
close this issue.
DONE: Proposal at [.3], but with new consideration at [.4]
- ACTION: editors to look at sections 4.2 & 4.3 of part2 and
see whether the first sentences (paragraphs) are
no-ops.
DONE: Recommend dropping these sentences. [.2]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC344
[.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0009.html
[.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0040.html
[.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0041.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
11. Issue LC353: What is a valid WSDL component model? [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC353
-----------------------------------------------------------------
12. Issue LC357: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1
Binding) from the i18n core wg (3) [.1]
[.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC357
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2005 21:49:44 UTC