- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:23:51 +0200
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20051011102351.GS26179@w3.org>
I agreed last week to take care of: 2005-09-26: editors to look at sections 4.2 & 4.3 of part2 and see whether the first sentences (paragraphs) are no-ops. (LC344#5), due 2005-10-06. This comes from the discussion of LC344 at the F2F[1]. Amy: questions the first sentence of section 4.2 of part2 .. the last 2 words seem to make the sentence are totally useless. Amy said: <alewis> I have a problem with the initial sentences/paragraphs of part two, sections 4.2 and 4.3 (IRI style and multipart style). Both say that the styles apply to any MEP with an initial message. This is *weird*. What is an MEP without an initial message? Is such a thing possible? I agree, it would be hard to have an MEP without an initial MEP. The only MEP which would have this property would be an MEP which does not have any messages exchanged, which goes against the definition of MEP. I propose to drop the first sentence of 4.2 and 4.3 in Part 2. Cheers, Hugo 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/att-0067/20050926-ws-desc-minutes.html#item13 -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2005 10:23:58 UTC