- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:43:37 -0400
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFB8F4D79C.9084F6C4-ON852570A0.007E6552-852570A1.0045E771@ca.ibm.com>
Here's my proposed text to be incorporated into the section on Operation Styles[1] to resolve LC344 comment 5[2] An operation style specifies additional information about an operation. For example, an operation style may define constraints on the element declarations used by the interface message reference components of the operation. This additional information in no way affects how a client interacts with the service and it may therefore be safely ignored in that context. However, the additional information may be used for other purposes, for example, improved code generation. The {style} property of the Operation component contains a set of zero or more URIs that identify operation styles. An Operation component MUST satisfy the specification defined by each operation style identified by its {style} property. Two operation styles are mutually incompatible if no Operation component can simultaneously satisfy them both. Any Operation component whose {style} property contains a pair of mutually incompatible operation style URIs is therefore invalid. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-20050803/#InterfaceOperationStyle [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC344 Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
Received on Friday, 21 October 2005 12:44:05 UTC