Friday, 31 May 2002
- Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion
- MDM/KDD 2002
- RDF on the web is inherently colored
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: Dark triples are not inherently nonmonotonic
Thursday, 30 May 2002
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Dark triples are inherently nonmonotonic (from Pat Hayes & R.Guha)
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
Wednesday, 29 May 2002
- Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion
- Re: help wanted: RDF issue rdfms-assertion
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- re: rdf inclusion
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: Is Model theory the only way to get predictability? (was Re: rdf inclusion)
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
Tuesday, 28 May 2002
- Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web (fwd)
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web
- Re: Define 'RDF' (was RE: MISC: Internet ...)
Monday, 27 May 2002
- Define 'RDF' (was RE: MISC: Internet ...)
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
Sunday, 26 May 2002
Saturday, 25 May 2002
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
Friday, 24 May 2002
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- RE: A plea against central planning (was: Why not import everything?)
- RE: A plea against central planning (was: Why not import everything?)
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: A plea against central planning (was: Why not import everything?)
- Re: A plea against central planning (was: Why not import everything?)
- Re: rdf inclusion
- RE: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: A plea against central planning (was: Why not import everything?)
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- Re: A plea against central planning (was: Why not import everything?)
- Sorry
- Re: MISC: Internet Media Type registration: proposed TAG finding
- re: rdf inclusion
- Is Model theory the only way to get predictability? (was Re: rdf inclusion)
Thursday, 23 May 2002
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Test
- Re: A plea against central planning (was: Why not import everything?)
- Re: A plea against central planning (was: Why not import everything?)
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: A plea against central planning (was: Why not import everything?)
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: A plea against central planning (was: Why not import everything?)
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: Why not import everything? (was: Re: getting daml:importsright is easy?)
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: Why not import everything? (was: Re: getting daml:importsright is easy?)
- Re: Why not import everything? (was: Re: getting daml:importsright is easy?)
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: Why not import everything? (was: Re: getting daml:imports right is easy?)
- Re: rdf inclusion
Thursday, 16 May 2002
Monday, 13 May 2002
Friday, 10 May 2002
Thursday, 9 May 2002
Wednesday, 8 May 2002
- Re: Why not import everything? (was: Re: getting daml:imports right is easy?)
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: rdf inclusion
- Re: Why not import everything? (was: Re: getting daml:imports right is easy?)
Saturday, 4 May 2002
Thursday, 2 May 2002
- Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web
- Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web
Wednesday, 1 May 2002
- Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web
- Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web
- Re: Why not import everything? (was: Re: getting daml:imports right is easy?)
- [www-rdf-logic] <none>
- RE: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web
- Re: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web
- RE: A Single Foundational Logic for the Semantic Web