- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 07:59:34 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- cc: <connolly@w3.org>, <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>
so rdfs is... > dangerously complicated. ...because we said that the full meaning of a property can't be fully captured by current W3C-sanctioned formalisms? That's realism, not complication. There are many things that are true of some RDF properties that RDFS, DAML+OIL, even CycL couldn't readily capture. If RDF property and class meaning is to be *exhaustively* captured by formalism, we'll need something more sophisticated than WebOnt's current sketch. If not, we need our specs to make clear that machines won't always understand the full picture. Dan -- mailto:danbri@w3.org http://www.w3.org/People/DanBri/
Received on Friday, 24 May 2002 07:59:38 UTC