www-html@w3.org from November 2004 by date

Wednesday, 24 November 2004

• Re: RFC: XHTML Report Extension Thomas O'Connor

Sunday, 21 November 2004

• Re: hr, fieldset, legend, sub, sup not to be removed XHTML Basic Vicente Luque Centeno
• Re: Embedding attributes and including content, vs. XFrames Trejkaz Xaoza

Saturday, 20 November 2004

• RFC: XHTML Report Extension John Richard Moser
• Re: Embedding attributes and including content, vs. XFrames Asbjørn Ulsberg
• Re: Embedding attributes and including content, vs. XFrames Trejkaz Xaoza

Friday, 19 November 2004

• Embedding attributes and including content, vs. XFrames Trejkaz Xaoza

Wednesday, 17 November 2004

• Xml2PDF formatting engine version 2.1 released Altsoft Xml2PDF

Monday, 15 November 2004

• Re: Question about which is the correct style of JavaScript to pass to FORM's onSubmit attribute Sean Dockery
• Re: Question about which is the correct style of JavaScript to pass to FORM's onSubmit attribute Asbjørn Ulsberg
• RE: Question about which is the correct style of JavaScript to pass to FORM's onSubmit attribute David Lieberman AWDSF

Friday, 12 November 2004

• Question about which is the correct style of JavaScript to pass to FORM's onSubmit attribute Sean Dockery
• RE: [newsml] Labels Misha Wolf
• Re: [XHTML 2] Browser Compliance Question Al Gilman
• RE: [newsml] Labels Paul Harman
• RE: [newsml] Labels Paul Harman
• Re: [newsml] Labels Takahiro FUJIWARA
• RE: [newsml] Labels Paul Harman
• RE: [newsml] Labels Paul Harman
• [XHTML 2] Browser Compliance Question David Lieberman AWDSF
• RE: [newsml] Labels Misha Wolf
• RE: [newsml] Labels Misha Wolf
• RE: [newsml] Labels Misha Wolf

Thursday, 11 November 2004

• RE: [newsml] Labels Misha Wolf

Wednesday, 10 November 2004

• RE: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME David Lieberman AWDSF

Tuesday, 9 November 2004

• Speech pronunciation of dates incerti auctoris

Wednesday, 10 November 2004

• RE: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME Ian Hickson
• Re: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME Ian Hickson
• Re: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME James Cerra

Tuesday, 9 November 2004

• Re: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME Asbjørn Ulsberg
• Re: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME trejkaz@trypticon.org

Monday, 8 November 2004

• Re: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME Dmitry Beransky
• Re: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME Asbjørn Ulsberg
• Re: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME Trejkaz Xaoza
• Re: Identifying (X)HTML without MIME Anne van Kesteren

Saturday, 6 November 2004

• Identifying (X)HTML without MIME James Cerra

Friday, 5 November 2004

• Re: Issues with <dl> [continued from Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l>] Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Issues with <dl> [continued from Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l>] Thomas O'Connor
• Re: Issues with <dl> [continued from Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l>] trejkaz@trypticon.org
• Re: Issues with <dl> [continued from Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l>] Jukka K. Korpela

Thursday, 4 November 2004

• Issues with <dl> [continued from Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l>] Thomas O'Connor
• Re: hr, fieldset, legend, sub, sup not to be removed XHTML Basic Rimantas Liubertas
• Re[2]: hr, fieldset, legend, sub, sup not to be removed XHTML Basic Alexander Savenkov
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Johannes Koch
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: hr, fieldset, legend, sub, sup not to be removed XHTML Basic Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: hr, fieldset, legend, sub, sup not to be removed XHTML Basic Asbjørn Ulsberg
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Thomas O'Connor

Wednesday, 3 November 2004

• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Thomas O'Connor
• Re: hr, fieldset, legend, sub, sup not to be removed XHTML Basic trejkaz@xaoza.net
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Asbjørn Ulsberg
• Re: hr, fieldset, legend, sub, sup not to be removed XHTML Basic Asbjørn Ulsberg
• Re: hr, fieldset, legend, sub, sup not to be removed XHTML Basic Rimantas Liubertas
• Re: hr, fieldset, legend, sub, sup not to be removed XHTML Basic trejkaz@trypticon.org
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Thomas O'Connor
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Jukka K. Korpela

Tuesday, 2 November 2004

• Re: hr, fieldset, legend, sub, sup not to be removed XHTML Basic Vicente Luque Centeno
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Thomas O'Connor
• Re: Recommendation for HTML 4.02 Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Florent Geffroy
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Recommendation for HTML 4.02 Justin Wood (Callek)
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Trejkaz Xaoza
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Asbjørn Ulsberg
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Asbjørn Ulsberg
• Re: Recommendation for HTML 4.02 Dosuchin
• Re: Recommendation for HTML 4.02 Lachlan Hunt

Sunday, 31 October 2004

• Concerns about the "l" element name <l> Antonio Gallardo

Monday, 1 November 2004

• Introductory article on IBM developerWorks Micah Dubinko

Saturday, 30 October 2004

• Recommendation for HTML 4.02 Dave DeLong
• hr, fieldset, legend, sub, sup not to be removed XHTML Basic Vicente Luque Centeno

Last message date: Wednesday, 24 November 2004 03:24:41 UTC