Re: Concerns about the "l" element name <l>

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:23:
> <a> should be <anchor>, imho. No need to cut the last five letters, I
> think.

Even that doesn't make sense anymore.  "Anchor" to me says "something you link 
_to_."  Which is not what <a/> really does anymore, since the W3C recommends 
everyone to use the id attribute for anchor points in a document.

Also, does <a/> really give any more meaning than <span/> these days?  Now 
that they both have the same attributes in XHTML 2.0, I'm surprised that <a/> 
is even still there. :-D

TX

-- 
             Email: Trejkaz Xaoza <trejkaz@xaoza.net>
          Web site: http://xaoza.net/
         Jabber ID: trejkaz@jabber.xaoza.net
   GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F  A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73