RFC2396bis wording, opinions?
- Re: RFC2396bis wording, opinions?
- Re: RFC2396bis wording, opinions?
- Re: RFC2396bis wording, opinions?
- Re: RFC2396bis wording, opinions?
- Re: RFC2396bis wording, opinions?
Re: removing [appearance of] constraints on 'resource' [024-identity]
removing constraints on 'resource' [024-identity]
- RE: removing constraints on 'resource' [024-identity]
- Re: removing constraints on 'resource' [024-identity]
- RE: removing constraints on 'resource' [024-identity]
- Re: removing constraints on 'resource' [024-identity]
- RE: removing constraints on 'resource' [024-identity]
- Re: FW: removing constraints on 'resource' [024-identity]
Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-05.txt
[URIEquivalence-15]: Action Item on URI comparison text in RFC239 6bis
implementation report: Links 2.1pre14
RFC 2396bis sec. D.2 editorial suggestion
representing UNC as a URI
draft-duerst-iri-07.txt: 2 week mailing list last call
- Re: draft-duerst-iri-07.txt: 2 week mailing list last call