- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 14:38:58 -0700
- To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
- Cc: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>, uri@w3.org
> Are you saying that you think the scheme definition *doesn't* > define the range of things identified by URIs using that scheme? Neither "urn" nor "tdb" define the range of things identified by URIs using that scheme. Most schemes only define how names are assigned, not what they are assigned to. > I'm wondering why you think we have different URI schemes, if the > resource-identifier to resource-identified mapping isn't defined by > the scheme. The mapping is defined by the scheme, but that doesn't imply the range has been assigned a singular type by that scheme. Perhaps you meant something else by your suggested wording, but that is how it reads. ....Roy
Received on Friday, 28 May 2004 18:00:21 UTC