Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-05.txt

Hello Roy,

At 16:35 04/05/25 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

>On Tuesday, May 25, 2004, at 01:28  AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
>>At 17:58 04/05/21 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>>>FYI, I was about ready to submit draft 05 to the IESG when I reviewed
>>>the latest procedures and found that the draft is missing a few
>>>required sections.  It would appear that a simultaneous update
>>>of RFC 2717 and RFC 2718 is also necessary for the sake of the
>>>required section on IANA considerations.
>>Can you give a bit more detail or pointers?
>A new checklist was published to replace the nits, as described below.

Many thanks for the pointer. It helped me add an IANA section to
the IRI draft at the last moment. I'm not sure why you would need
an update to RFC 2717 and RFC 2718. Wouldn't it simply be enough
to say, in your IANA section, that the relevant references to
RFC 2396 in RFC 2717 and RFC 2718 should be replaced by RFC
2396bis? I have copied Ted Hardie, maybe he can help here?

Regards,    Martin.

>Begin forwarded message:
>>From: The IESG <>
>>Date: Thu May 20, 2004  6:34:26  AM America/Los_Angeles
>>To: IETF-Announce: ;
>>Subject: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits
>>     As you probably all know, we have used the ID-nits for a few
>>     years to help you all to prepare your Internet-Drafts such that
>>     they will process faster through the AD-review, IETF Last Call
>>     and IESG approval process.
>>     The name was somewhat wrong in that it is more a serious checklist
>>     than merely "nits" (however, there are some nits too).
>>     The IESG, RFC-Editor and IANA have evaluated the checklist, and
>>     a new (improved) ID-Checklist is now available at
>>     Please help us all by actually CHECKING your Internet-Draft BEFORE
>>     you pass it on to your AD and the IESG via a "request to publish".
>>     It will help to make the process go faster and reduce the workload
>>     on all of us if your document has been checked and complies with
>>     the guidance/rules in the ID-Checklist.
>>     Thanks, the IESG

Received on Sunday, 30 May 2004 08:57:40 UTC