Re: draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-05.txt

On Tuesday, May 25, 2004, at 01:28  AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
> At 17:58 04/05/21 -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
>> FYI, I was about ready to submit draft 05 to the IESG when I reviewed
>> the latest procedures and found that the draft is missing a few
>> required sections.  It would appear that a simultaneous update
>> of RFC 2717 and RFC 2718 is also necessary for the sake of the
>> required section on IANA considerations.
>
> Can you give a bit more detail or pointers?

A new checklist was published to replace the nits, as described below.

....Roy

Begin forwarded message:

> From: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Date: Thu May 20, 2004  6:34:26  AM America/Los_Angeles
> To: IETF-Announce: ;
> Subject: New ID-Checklist to replace ID-nits
>
>     As you probably all know, we have used the ID-nits for a few
>     years to help you all to prepare your Internet-Drafts such that
>     they will process faster through the AD-review, IETF Last Call
>     and IESG approval process.
>
>     The name was somewhat wrong in that it is more a serious checklist
>     than merely "nits" (however, there are some nits too).
>     The IESG, RFC-Editor and IANA have evaluated the checklist, and
>     a new (improved) ID-Checklist is now available at
>
>             http://www.ietf.org/ID-Checklist.html
>
>     Please help us all by actually CHECKING your Internet-Draft BEFORE
>     you pass it on to your AD and the IESG via a "request to publish".
>     It will help to make the process go faster and reduce the workload
>     on all of us if your document has been checked and complies with
>     the guidance/rules in the ID-Checklist.
>
>     Thanks, the IESG

Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2004 19:35:46 UTC