2.0 Issues - status?
[widgets] W3C Widgets Digital Signatures implementer feedback
ACTION-764: Review placement of base64 alg in 1.1/2.0, should it be under transforms?
ACTION-766 base64 updates
ACTION-767: Review references etc.
Additional 1.1 Requirements update completed
Additional documents to publish with 1.1 CR publication
Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2011-01-04
Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2011-01-04 (v2)
Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2011-01-11
Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2011-01-18
Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2011-01-25
Approved minutes 2010-01-18 for posting
Changes to 2.0 draft
- Cantor, Scott E. (Friday, 7 January)
- Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com (Friday, 7 January)
- Cantor, Scott E. (Wednesday, 5 January)
- Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com (Wednesday, 5 January)
- Cantor, Scott E. (Tuesday, 4 January)
- Cantor, Scott E. (Tuesday, 4 January)
Changes to C14N 2.0
CURIEs
Draft minutes 2010-01-11
Draft minutes 2010-01-18
Draft minutes 2011-01-25
Editorial updates per ACTION-767 proposals
Editorial updates to 1.1 drafts
Fwd: [widgets] W3C Widgets Digital Signatures implementer feedback
Fwd: Consideration in lieu of starting a PAG
Important call tomorrow - ECC and CR decisions
ISSUE-225: Whether to ignore xml:space and relationship to TrimTextNodes
ISSUE-226: What protection is gained by the <dsig2:IDAttributes> element?
Meeting for Jan 18
Minutes 2011-01-04
Namespace prefixes in XPath
Progressing XML Signature Properties draft - next steps?
Regrets for tomorrow
Update to XML Signature 2.0 editors draft
Updated ECC-ALGS reference in XML Signature 1.1 and XML Encryption 1.1
Updated XML Signature 2.0 editors draft
Updates to C14N 2.0 and dsig-xpath
XML Security 1.1 Editorial Updates
XML Security Algorithms Cross-Reference for 1.1 and 2.0
XML Security KeyInfoReference confusion
XML Sig 2.0: What protection is gained by the <dsig2:IDAttributes> element?
xml:base and C14N2, ACTION-729 clarification
Last message date: Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:29:14 UTC