[fwd] RE: intent to squat on xpointer() -- normative reference issue(ACTION-66) (from: pgrosso@ptc.com)
ACTION 57. Starting document on test cases
ACTION-60
ACTION-62
ACTION-63 done, see wiki
ACTION-65: test cases for C14N with comments, scheme-based xpointers
Action-69: "Ed Simon to Draft warning similar to that of section 7.2 of RFC 2253"
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-10
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-10 v2
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-17
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-17 v2
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-17 v3
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-31
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-31 v2
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-31 v3
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-08-07
Draft minutes: XMLSEC weekly 2007-06-26
Draft minutes: XMLSEC weekly 2007-07-10
Draft minutes: XMLsec weekly 2007-07-17
editor's draft updated (ACTION-64)
Exclusive Canonicalization and XML Canonicalization 1.1
Identifiers for XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 in XML Signature spec
intent to squat on xpointer() -- normative reference issue (ACTION-66)
intent to squat on xpointer() -- normative reference issue(ACTION-66)
New version of the interop document with details of test cases
Normative reference to URI spec
position papers
RFC 4514/2253 compatibility
Section 4.4.4 proposed changes
Trouble Ahead: Normative references to 2001 XPointer CR.
Type vs MimeType (Re: ACTION-60)
updated editor's draft
updated editors draft - section 6.1
Last message date: Tuesday, 31 July 2007 18:51:59 UTC