public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org from July 2007 by subject

[fwd] RE: intent to squat on xpointer() -- normative reference issue(ACTION-66) (from: pgrosso@ptc.com)

ACTION 57. Starting document on test cases

ACTION-60

ACTION-62

ACTION-63 done, see wiki

ACTION-65: test cases for C14N with comments, scheme-based xpointers

Action-69: "Ed Simon to Draft warning similar to that of section 7.2 of RFC 2253"

Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-10

Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-10 v2

Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-17

Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-17 v2

Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-17 v3

Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-31

Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-31 v2

Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-07-31 v3

Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-08-07

Draft minutes: XMLSEC weekly 2007-06-26

Draft minutes: XMLSEC weekly 2007-07-10

Draft minutes: XMLsec weekly 2007-07-17

editor's draft updated (ACTION-64)

Exclusive Canonicalization and XML Canonicalization 1.1

Identifiers for XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 in XML Signature spec

intent to squat on xpointer() -- normative reference issue (ACTION-66)

intent to squat on xpointer() -- normative reference issue(ACTION-66)

New version of the interop document with details of test cases

Normative reference to URI spec

position papers

RFC 4514/2253 compatibility

Section 4.4.4 proposed changes

Trouble Ahead: Normative references to 2001 XPointer CR.

Type vs MimeType (Re: ACTION-60)

updated editor's draft

updated editors draft - section 6.1

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 July 2007 18:51:59 UTC