- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:23:21 +0200
- To: Ed Simon <edsimon@xmlsec.com>
- Cc: public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
On 2007-07-10 10:22:16 -0400, Ed Simon wrote: > The XML Signature spec indicates the identifiers for using XSLT > 1.0 and XPath 1.0 as transforms. Should we not also include those > for XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 now that those are released (and will > generally be more commonly used now)? Or is that something for > v2.0 of XML Signature? > FYI, I'm having vague recollections that fundamental changes to > the nature of XPath between XPath 1.0 and XPath 2.0 may affect > the text we have in the XML Signature spec re XPath. I will > continue to contemplate this. I'd suggest that that's beyond what we need to do. Since, as far as dsig-core is concerned, we're really operating under a "minimal changes" charter, I'd suggest we document and defer. (That said, it might be worth writing a note that initially defines some URIs.) Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 14:25:35 UTC