Re: updated editor's draft

I think the C14N 1.1 algs also should be listed in Section 6.1.

I forgot if we discussed this in a past meeting, but weren't we also 
going to add the Exclusive C14N algorithms to section 6.1/6.5 
(Canonicalization Algorithms)?

--Sean

Thomas Roessler wrote:
> I've made changes corresponding to Paul's proposals in the latest
> iteration of the editor's draft:
> 
>   XML-Signature Syntax and Processing
>   Editor's Draft $Date: 2007/07/26 16:06:49 $
>   http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/
> 
> Specifically:
> 
> - added "Support of the xpointer() scheme [XPointer-xpointer] beyond the
>   minimal usage discussed in this section is discouraged." to the
>   insert in section 4.3.3.2, where the behavior of the xpointer()
>   idioms we need is defined
> 
> - Replaced the duplicate definition of these XPointers in section
>   4.3.3.3 by a reference to 4.3.3.2
> 
> - Moved the definition of same-document URI references in 4.3.3.2
>   out of a parenthesis into a separate paragraph.
> 
> While writing this, it occurs to me that the reference to the
> xpointer() Working Draft that I meant to insert is still missing.
> Doing that in a moment.

Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 19:15:02 UTC