[fwd] Clarification sought re C14N11 (from: tlr@w3.org)
[Moderator Action] RE: Antwort: RE: AW: XML Signature - Request for clarification [Virus checked]
Action-69: "Ed Simon to Draft warning similar to that of section 7.2 of RFC 2253"
ACTION-73: which xpointers are used and where, contact ebics etc
ACTION-76 completed - clarify same-document reference, change URI reference
ACTION-77 completed - update C14N11 Algorithm URIs
ACTION-78 completed
ACTION-79 completed, update editors draft for 4.3.3.1 and URI-Literal changes.
ACTION-80 completed, update XML Signature examples
added action for URI-Literal RFC 2732
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-08-07 v2
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-08-14
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-08-14 v2
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-08-21
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-08-21 v2
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-08-21 v3
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-08-28
Agenda: Distributed meeting 2007-09-04 (resend)
C14N 1.1 Test Cases questions
Clarification sought re C14N11
Comments on test case doc
Comments on Test Cases, 5 August version, part 1
Decryption Transform and same-document reference
deprecating xpointer
Draft minutes 2007-08-14
Examples in XML Signature draft
Modified testcase document
New version of interop document
New version of the interop document with details of test cases
Normative reference to URI spec
Proposed change to XML Signature for RFC 2732 change - ACTION-79
Revised XPointer xpointer() scheme discouragement
talk about exclusive c14n in best practices doc?
Updated editors draft of XML Signature, Second Edition
updated XML Signature editors draft
W3C XMLSec Minutes corrections for 7 Aug Teleconference
XML Signature - Request for clarification [Virus checked]
Last message date: Friday, 31 August 2007 06:05:52 UTC