- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:39:14 -0400
- To: ext Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
Would it be possible for you to share a draft on the xmlsec mailing list? regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Aug 1, 2007, at 10:56 AM, ext Anthony Nadalin wrote: > I think so as we tried to capture some of this in the WS-Security > specifications, maybe we can pull some of that info out > > Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122 > > <graycol.gif> > Thomas Roessler ---08/01/2007 09:52:22 AM---Tony, > > <ecblank.gif> > > From: > <ecblank.gif> > > Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> > <ecblank.gif> > > To: > <ecblank.gif> > > Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS > <ecblank.gif> > > Cc: > <ecblank.gif> > > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > <ecblank.gif> > > Date: > <ecblank.gif> > > 08/01/2007 09:52 AM > <ecblank.gif> > > Subject: > <ecblank.gif> > > talk about exclusive c14n in best practices doc? > > > > > Tony, > > following the conversation on yesterday's call, I wonder if it's > worth discussing the circumstances in which inclusive and exclusive > canonicalization are most useful in the Best Practices document. > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > -- > Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> >
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 18:40:32 UTC