Intersection use case
Angenda, WS-Addressing call 2007-04-30
Draft Minutes 2007-04-23 are attached
Response to the Last Call comments by WS-Policy to the WS-Addressing Metadata document 1.0
Non-anon extensibility and policy intersection
- RE: Non-anon extensibility and policy intersection
- Re: Non-anon extensibility and policy intersection
Draft: Response to the Last Call comments by WS-Policy to the WS-Addressing Metadata document 1.0
- Re: Draft: Response to the Last Call comments by WS-Policy to the WS-Addressing Metadata document 1.0
- RE: Draft: Response to the Last Call comments by WS-Policy to the WS-Addressing Metadata document 1.0
Likely regrets for 23 April
WS-Addressing Agenda, Today's call 16:00 EDT
Draft minutes from 2007-04-16 are attached
RE: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary?
- RE: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary?
- RE: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary?
WS-Addressing; Scribe list for today's call
Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- RE: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- RE: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- RE: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- RE: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- Re: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
- RE: Policy alternatives, negation, [Non]AnonResponse assertion and the none URI
WS-Addr Agenda today's call at 16:00 Eastern
Reminder: No meeting today
New Proposed Alternative H to resolve WS Policy LC comments on WSAM
Response to the Last Call comments by WS-Policy to the WS-Addressing Metadata document 1.0
Draft Minutes WS-Addressing teleconference 2007-04-02 are attached
FW: [ws-rx] Revised W3C WS-Policy 1.5 Candidate Recommendation Working Drafts
Consolodated changes for alterngive G prime
- Re: Consolodated changes for alterngive G prime
Agenda, WS-Addressing Today's call at 16:00 Eastern
Re: New Alternative G to resolve LC comment on WS addr metadata
- Re: New Alternative G to resolve LC comment on WS addr metadata
NEW issue: Core/SOAP Binding errata -- need to update the reference to ws-addr wsdl binding
Freund 3/29/2007: WS-Addressing/Policy Questions on Alternatives G (if selected)
Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- RE: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- RE: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- RE: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- RE: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- RE: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- RE: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR
- Re: Need for new Rec or TR on attaching policy to EPR