- From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:54:33 -0400
- To: Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>
- CC: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 20:55:46 UTC
I know from one source that a given server understands WS-Addressing and can handle non-anonymous response endpoints. Furthermore, this source tells us that said endpoints must have either HTTP or Jabber destinations. (for concreteness, you might think of this as a default behavior for a site) >From another source, we learn that this same server's non-anonymous response endpoints must have either Jabber or Mailto destinations. (and this might be further description of the particular server) Combining the information from these sources, we conclude that said non-anonymous endpoints must have Mailto destinations. How do we express all this in WSP? In particular, can we use policy intersection to combine the information from the two sources and get the expected result. Variant: Instead of "must have" the sources tell us that the EPRs "may have" the given kind of destination. The combined information is thus that the destinations may be HTTP, Jabber /or/ mailto. Further variants: It seems reasonable for sources of information to be able to say things like "must not have ...", or for one source to say "must have HTTP or Jabber" and another to say "must not have jabber".
Received on Monday, 30 April 2007 20:55:46 UTC