Alexandra Lacourba
- Reminder - Re: TPAC 2018 registration now open
- Reminder and additional information - Re: TPAC 2018 registration now open
Bernard Aboba
- Doodle Poll for WebRTC WG Virtual Interim, week of August 27-31, 2018
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- RE: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Differential protection (was SVC)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Issue 1858: the astonishing behavior of transceiver.stop
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0
- Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0
Bernard Aboba via GitHub
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCSctpTransportState cleanup
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: What sender.getParameters().codecs returns before negotiation
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Delete Example 14
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Explain why additional certificate checks are unnecessary
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: "direction" and rtcrtpheaderextensionparameters
Dominique Hazael-Massieux
- Fwd: Reminder: TPAC 2018 registration / W3C IEs waiver
- Fwd: Call for Participation: W3C Workshop on Permissions and User Consent
- WebRTC Stats as CR and FPWD of Content Hint, DSCP Marking
Florent Castelli via GitHub
Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Issue 1858: the astonishing behavior of transceiver.stop
- Feature policy: Introspection
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Issue 1858: the astonishing behavior of transceiver.stop
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
- [webrtc-pc] Identity needs to refer to track not stream
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Move isolated streams to identity spec
- [webrtc-pc] RTCError suberrors for identity should move to identity spec
- [webrtc-pc] Move [[WEBRTC-IDENTITY]] to its own repo
- [webrtc-pc] Move Isolated Streams from [[WEBRTC]] to [[WEBRTC-IDENTITY]]
henbos via GitHub
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add warning to RTCRtpTransceiver.stop(). Stop rejected transceivers at SLD().
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCRtpReceiver.streams
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCRtpSender.streamIds
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCRtpReceiver.isActive added.
Henrik Boström
itsthetaste via GitHub
Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Issue 1858: the astonishing behavior of transceiver.stop
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0
Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fire track event in response to remote sender.setStreams() changes.
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarify stats lifetimes and statsended event.
- [webrtc-pc] Direction can get out of sync, blocking updates.
- [webrtc-pc] Rename sender.transport.transport to sender.transport.iceTransport?
na-g via GitHub
- [webrtc-stats] References to "objectDeleted" can be removed
- [webrtc-stats] RTCIceCandidateStats.deleted can be removed
Philipp Hancke via GitHub
Sergio Garcia Murillo
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
- Re: Some ideas on SVC support in WebRTC 1.0 (Take 2)
stefan hakansson via GitHub
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Made maxFramerate and scaleResolutionDownBy unsigned long (were: doub…
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Reject promise at replaceTrack if TRX is stopped.
- [webrtc-pc] Promise should be rejected if transceiver is stopped
Stefan Håkansson LK
- More checks for RTCRtpSender.setParameters()?
- Re: Issue 1858: the astonishing behavior of transceiver.stop
- OK to close Issues?
Steve Anton via GitHub
- [webrtc-pc] Is an RTCIceServer with no urls useful?
- [webrtc-pc] Cannot update associated remote streams for a track once added
W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
- Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications)
Xueyuan
- Web Real-Time Communications Working Group Revised Charter Approved; Call for Participation
- Call for Exclusions: Identifiers for WebRTC's Statistics API
- Call for Exclusions: MediaStreamTrack Content Hints; WebRTC DSCP Control API