Adam Barth
- Re: [webappsec] Call for Consensus: CSP 1.1 to FPWD (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: [webappsec] Call for Consensus: CSP 1.1 to FPWD (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: [webappsec] Call for Consensus: CSP 1.1 to FPWD (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: [websec] Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: [webappsec] subsume X-XSS-Protection into CSP 1.1? (Saturday, 17 November)
- Re: [webappsec] subsume X-XSS-Protection into CSP 1.1? (Tuesday, 13 November)
- Re: [webappsec] subsume X-XSS-Protection into CSP 1.1? (Friday, 9 November)
- Re: [webappsec] subsume X-XSS-Protection into CSP 1.1? (Thursday, 8 November)
- Re: ISSUE-38: Discuss no-mixed-content further as a 1.1 experimental directive (Friday, 2 November)
- Re: Script-nonce policies (Friday, 2 November)
- Re: Script-nonce policies (Friday, 2 November)
- Re: CSP, style-src, and what it means to ignore style attributes (Friday, 2 November)
Alex Russell
Arthur Barstow
Boris Zbarsky
bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
Carine Bournez
Dan Veditz
David Lin-Shung Huang
Devdatta Akhawe
Dirk Schulze
Eduardo' Vela
Eric Chen
Eric Rescorla
Fred Andrews
Hill, Brad
- RE: [webappsec] ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus on new WebAppSec WG Charter (Thursday, 29 November)
- [webappsec] ACTION REQUIRED: Call for Consensus on new WebAppSec WG Charter (Tuesday, 27 November)
- [webappsec] Call for Consensus: CSP 1.1 to FPWD (Tuesday, 27 November)
- [webappsec] Teleconference Poll: time unchanged (Wednesday, 21 November)
- RE: A11y for Web App Sec Anti clickjacking spec (Wednesday, 21 November)
- RE: CORS test status (Wednesday, 21 November)
- [webappsec] New draft charter for discussion (Tuesday, 20 November)
- [webappsec] Agenda for Teleconference of Nov 20, 2012 (Tuesday, 20 November)
- RE: Please fix! [Pub request: FPWD of User Interface Safety Directives for CSP] (Tuesday, 20 November)
- [webappsec] TPAC chatlog cleanup (Monday, 19 November)
- RE: how to protect javascript codes (Saturday, 17 November)
- Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation (Thursday, 15 November)
- [webappsec] PLEASE RESPOND: poll for new teleconference time (Thursday, 15 November)
- RE: [webappsec] subsume X-XSS-Protection into CSP 1.1? (Thursday, 8 November)
- [webappsec] subsume X-XSS-Protection into CSP 1.1? (Thursday, 8 November)
- RE: [webappsec] updated draft SVG: simple CORS request (Wednesday, 7 November)
- [webappsec] Reminder, today's call is CANCELLED (Tuesday, 6 November)
- RE: Batching CSP violation reports. (Monday, 5 November)
- [webappsec] call for reportURIs DOM API use cases (Monday, 5 November)
- [webappsec] Remote participation in IETF websec meeting (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: Please fix! [Pub request: FPWD of User Interface Safety Directives for CSP] (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: Please fix! [Pub request: FPWD of User Interface Safety Directives for CSP] (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: ISSUE-28: What specific attacks are prevented by OS screenshots, should this be recommended against generally? (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: ISSUE-28: What specific attacks are prevented by OS screenshots, should this be recommended against generally? (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: Script-nonce policies (Sunday, 4 November)
- TPAC meeting adjourned (Friday, 2 November)
- updated test VM link (Thursday, 1 November)
- Running a few min late (Thursday, 1 November)
- TPAC schedule clarification (Thursday, 1 November)
Ian Jacobs
Ian Melven
Jacob Rossi
Joel Howard Willis Weinberger
Karl Dubost
L. David Baron
Léonie Watson
Mike West
- Re: Trigger a DOM event/error when a CSP violation happens. (Thursday, 29 November)
- Re: [webappsec] Call for Consensus: CSP 1.1 to FPWD (Thursday, 29 November)
- Re: Trigger a DOM event/error when a CSP violation happens. (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: Trigger a DOM event/error when a CSP violation happens. (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: Trigger a DOM event/error when a CSP violation happens. (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: [webappsec] subsume X-XSS-Protection into CSP 1.1? (Saturday, 17 November)
- Re: [webappsec] subsume X-XSS-Protection into CSP 1.1? (Saturday, 17 November)
- Re: [webappsec] subsume X-XSS-Protection into CSP 1.1? (Monday, 12 November)
- Re: [webappsec] updated draft SVG: simple CORS request (Wednesday, 7 November)
- Re: Batching CSP violation reports. (Monday, 5 November)
- Batching CSP violation reports. (Monday, 5 November)
Mountie Lee
neil matatall
Odin Hørthe Omdal
Robin Berjon
Thomas Roessler
Web Application Security Working Group Issue Tracker
- webappsec-ISSUE-40 (X-XSS-Protection): Look at incorporating X-XSS-Protection functionality into CSP 1.1 (Thursday, 8 November)
- ISSUE-39: Discuss CSP relevant use cases for possibly including Meta Referrer as a CSP directive (Friday, 2 November)
- ISSUE-38: Discuss no-mixed-content further as a 1.1 experimental directive (Friday, 2 November)
- ISSUE-37: How to apply plugin-types in CSP 1.1 to iframes (Friday, 2 November)
- ISSUE-36: Are we interested in considering script-hash as a CSP 1.1 directive? (Friday, 2 November)
- ISSUE-35: Should we add an "httpOnly" like directive to CSP to indicate that the state of this policy is not available to the script APIs? (Friday, 2 November)
- ISSUE-34: Discuss use cases / risks of script access to CSP information, solicit specific public comment on this feature with FPWD (Friday, 2 November)
- ISSUE-33: Need to address blob, data, filesystem URL types with greater specificity in CSP 1.1 spec (Friday, 2 November)
- ISSUE-32: Do we specify that path-specificity applies only to hierarchical URI schemes? (Friday, 2 November)
- ISSUE-31: What specification's definition of URL/URI are we using for path parsing in CSP 1.1? (Friday, 2 November)
- ISSUE-30: How to address dynamic application of CSP post page load / partial page load via META or script interface (Friday, 2 November)
- ISSUE-29: What are sane defaults for clipping with clipping or selectors? (Thursday, 1 November)
- ISSUE-28: What specific attacks are prevented by OS screenshots, should this be recommended against generally? (Thursday, 1 November)
- ISSUE-27: Implementation concern on how to enforce display-time : should we provide more advice on how to do this efficiently? (Thursday, 1 November)
- ISSUE-26: Does the sandbox directive make sense in a meta tag context? (Thursday, 1 November)
- ISSUE-25: Do frame-options directives (or other UISafety directives) make sense in a meta tag context? (Thursday, 1 November)
- ISSUE-24: (); (Thursday, 1 November)
- ISSUE-23: Are there cases of synthetic UIEvents where it would be useful to set the unsafe attribute even if the policy is block so event is not delivered (Thursday, 1 November)
- ISSUE-22: Are there cases of synthetic UIEvents where it would be useful to set the unsafe attribute even if the policy is block (so event is not delivered) (Thursday, 1 November)
- ISSUE-21: Do assistive technologies send real events or synthetic events? (Thursday, 1 November)
- ISSUE-20: If browsers apply this heuristic without an explicit opt-in policy, should we always block and not have the unsafe UIEvent property (Thursday, 1 November)
Last message date: Thursday, 29 November 2012 20:17:59 UTC