- From: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:43:50 +0000
- To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Cc: public-webappsec@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CANr5HFX1tfxa191sqNwBNEdqyv6gRds9kD4Vr=4_=Ea4a3LxAQ@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > We should probably consider allowing CSP violation reports to be batched > up. Right now we're making one HTTP POST per violation; it might be a good > idea to continue to allow that behavior, but also allow multiple > 'csp-report' objects to be batched up in a single request for efficiency. > > I'd suggest allowing them to be simply joined an array of such objects: > > [ > { > "csp-report": { > "document-uri": "http://example.org/page.html", > "referrer": "http://evil.example.com/haxor.html", > "blocked-uri": "http://evil.example.com/image.png", > "violated-directive": "default-src 'self'", > "original-policy": "default-src 'self'; report-uri > http://example.org/csp-report.cgi" > } > }, > { > "csp-report": { > "document-uri": "http://example.org/page.html", > "referrer": "http://evil.example.com/haxor.html", > "blocked-uri": "http://evil.example.com/image.png", > "violated-directive": "default-src 'self'", > "original-policy": "default-src 'self'; report-uri > http://example.org/csp-report.cgi" > } > } > ] > > WDYT? > > -- > Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Developer Advocate > Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany > Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 >
Received on Monday, 5 November 2012 18:44:49 UTC